Choosing the right marking workflow

This options will completely bipass the marking module of Cirrus. Results will automatically be published according the publication settings (see Assessment Option panel).

As soon as the candidate hands in the results, the results will be visible in Reports too.


Summary: All the questions will be automatically scored and published.

Manually score auto-scored questions

This options is basically the other way around. Although the questions are auto scored, you still can decide to have them manually assessed.
In this scenario:

• The finished scripts will go to the marking module of Cirrus
• They will be scored already
• But you have the possibility to manually overwrite this score

Summary: You can manually score auto scored questions on the Assess tab in the marking module of Cirrus.

Manual marking: for open questions

When the assessment contains open questions, these will need to be assessed by one or more markers and moderators (optional). 

For Assessments that need a human marker, the assessment author can chose between the simple and the extended marking workflow:

• Scheduler is assessor (Simple): the person who is going to schedule the assessment will also be the one and only marker.
• Coordinator assign assessors (Extended): a coordinator is going to assigns assessor(s) and moderator(s) (optional)

Simple marking workflow: scheduler = marker

If you select this when publishing the assessment, whoever schedules the assessment will also become the marker for the assessment. No moderation will be involved.

This assessor will be able to assess the exam on the Assess tab in the marking module of Cirrus.

This is often used in smaller organisations or in higher education for formative assessments.

Choses the wrong workflow by accident

Not to worry, you can still change this. On the 'Marking > Coorindator overview' all markings (simple of extended) are available. By default only the 'extended' workflows are shown, you might need to adjust the filter to see also the simple workflows.
You can still assign other assessors or moderation if needed

Extended marking workflow: multiple markers and moderators

Choosing this option will allow a coordinator (with access to Marking > Coordinator) to set up a workflow that included multiple assessors and moderators and a ton of options to get the job done in the way you want.

This workflow starts on the Coordinator tab. Read more about it here.

Tips: Remember: it depends on the assessment's setting what it means if the results are published, i.e. if the candidate will see anything on their dashboard for example. Publishing can also be necessary for retrieval of results depending on integrations and work-processes in place. When looking up results - remember to check the ‘Total items found’ listed on the page (10,30,50 or 100) for large groups/ cohorts. You can also use the Filter by option provided on the results screen to submit large sets of results. This can be done in the Results screen (Marking) for any assessment